Option 1

1. Oscar Schindler is both virtuous and immoral. Do you agree with this statement?
Why or why not?

I agree but not entirely. Oscar Shindler was viewed as virtuous and immoral to Jews, because he was a man with a good manner of treating Jews and had different thoughts about jews compare to the other Generals or the soldiers. But in my opinion, he would't had been nice if i didn't need labors for his factory. He came to get some workers to the camp to have labors in his factory because he started losing his money day by day since he was a businessman. All his purpose was to earn money and in order to earn money he needed labors. yeah if I already had enough labors in his factory. He wouldn't come to the camp to visit Amon. What he brought the the camp is the money and the labors. But I am still agreeing that he is nice.



 2. "Whoever saves one life, saves the world entire." --> Do you think Schindler save the world? Defend your answer.

That statement could make scence because every big things started from tiny things. But I don't think Schindler is the savior of the World.  The quote "Whoever saves one life, saves the world entire."  was spoken by a jewish person who was working under Schinlder and working in the better condition than any other jews. Generally people think a man or a woman  is the best or good when he/she treat them nicely but once that person treat them not nicely people would temporally think that that guy is bad. What I am saying is that people change their mind time to time. So the thoughts of Schindler's worker's could not be correct. Because they said Schinder is the savior of the world just by viewing of his possitive side. For my opinion. you can't jugde people just by looking at his/her possitive side, because everyone may be viewed as they are the perfect kind of one just by tasting their possitive sides. So my personal answer for the question, my answer is NO.